Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kaufman v. Farah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1952Published

1Dissent

Doee, J. P.

(dissenting). In this third complaint brought by an attorney for services rendered to defendant’s wife, defendant has again moved to dismiss for insufficiency. The original complaint was dismissed for insufficiency by Special Term. The second complaint was dismissed for insufficiency by this court (Kaufman v. Farah, 276 App. Div. 178); the Court of Appeals modified (303 N. Y. 819) the judgment entered on the order but provided that plaintiff be permitted to plead over. The third complaint now before us is the repleading thus permitted.

*51Plaintiff seeks recovery for legal services…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kaufman v. FarahNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API