Legal Opinion

Earl Lavann Reese v. Gerard Frey

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1986No. 86-1196PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Earl Lavann Reese appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 1 For reversal Reese contends that the state prosecutor suppressed exculpatory evidence in the form of an arrest warrant, that his trial counsel was incompetent in failing to discover and use the warrant, that his appellate counsel was incompetent for failing to raise the warrant issue on direct appeal, and that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his habeas petition. We affirm.

Shortly after a robbery in Kansas City, police…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas W. TierneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carlos Jones, Also Known as Dion Tillman, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Mario Antonio Polanco-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Edward Richard Clark v. Frank W. Wood, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API