Legal Opinion

State v. Chicoine

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 24, 2007No. 05-529PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

V 1. Defendant Philip Chicoine entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of felony possession of cocaine, 18 V.S.A. § 4231(a)(2), after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence discovered in the course of a police officer’s pat-down following a traffic stop. On appeal, the State did not seek to justify the warrantless search as a frisk for weapons, but defended the court’s conclusion that the pat-down was reasonable as incident to a valid arrest for drug possession. We find, however, that the investigating officer lacked probable cause to arrest, so the war-rantless…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. State v. ZaccaroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ChicoineSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API