Legal Opinion
M.H. v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2017No. 590629/12 101083/12PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kern, J.
This action arises from injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiffs when a fire pot and fuel gel purchased from defendant suddenly combusted and exploded. The product at issue is a combination of a ceramic pot, called the “FireBurners” Pot, with a stainless steel fuel reservoir at its center and a bottle of gelled fuel for use with the fire pot called “FireGel.” Plaintiffs allege that their injuries occurred when the fire pot was refueled with the fuel gel and an explosion occurred. A red sticker affixed to the fire pot itself that must be removed in order to use…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Yun Tung Chow v. Reckitt & Colman, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Camillo v. GeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Butt v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Valerio v. 265 McClellan Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Tusu v. LeoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Vasquez v. Ridge Tool Pattern Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022