Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Kunz

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 10, 1992No. 90-279PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is a dispute between adjoining landowners over the nature and extent of a right-of-way that provides access over defendants’ property to plaintiffs’ property.

Plaintiffs acquired a vacation home on a 104-acre parcel of land in Topsham, Vermont, from Robert Armstrong and Hollis Ewing, by warranty deed dated May 24, 1988. Plaintiffs’ property is virtually inaccessible without the use of an old road that crosses defendants’ parcel. The existence of the road predated plaintiffs’ purchase. Predecessors in title had also used this road to reach the property, and, in fact, townspeople and others…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  2. Russell v. PareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. Scott v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  4. Griffith v. NielsenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Sabins v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Broadwater Development, L.L.C. v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Post & Beam Equities Group, LLC v. Sunne Village Development Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. Rowe v. LavanwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API