Legal Opinion
Crosby Et Ux. v. Harral Et Ux.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1931No. 3610PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PIUDSPETH, J.
On the petition of Steve Crosby and Mary L. Crosby, his wife, for the adoption of Mary Mildred Plarral, a decree of adoption was entered. The protestants, Edgar F. Harral and Rosa J. Harral, his wife, appeal.
The petitioners are the foster parents of the mother of the infant, and the appellants are the paternal grandparents of the infant. The court found that Mary Mildred Harral was the infant daughter of Phelps Harral and Elizabeth Harral; that prior to February 8, 1929, the date of the filing of the petition, the parents of the infant had abandoned her; that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wallace v. BlanchardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Pra v. GherardiniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- Blanchard v. State Ex Rel. WallaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- Hase v. SummersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barwin v. ReidyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. HeimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Onsrud v. LehmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Hill v. PattonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Cook v. BrownleeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.