Legal Opinion

William Francis Rupp v. Harley O. Teets, as Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1956No. 14861_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant Rupp is held by Warden Teets, the appellee, pursuant to a judgment and commitment of a California Superior Court imposing the death penalty by reason of Rupp’s conviction of murder in the first degree. The killing was in an attempt to perpetrate rape.

After an unsuccessful appeal to the California Supreme Court, People v. Rupp, 41 Cal.2d 371, 260 P.2d 1, and a denial of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court, he filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of California which was denied and his petition for writ of certiorari to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. People v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. RuppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henry Hughes v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. East Crossroads Center, Inc. v. Mellon-Stuart Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. George M. Wood, Jr. v. Conneaut Lake Park, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  4. Rupp v. TeetsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API