Slade v. Zeitfuss
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover for rent, by an assignee of tbe claim, brought to the City Court of New Haven where the defendant filed a plea in abatement to the jurisdiction, which was sustained, Dow, J., from which judgment the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHamersley, J.
The non-negotiable chose in action upon which this suit is brought is a claim for money which became due from the defendant to Lewisohn Brothers for the use and occupation of their store in New York by the defendant. At the commencement of the action, Lewisohn Brothers, or their legal representatives, were residents of New York. The defendant was a resident of Greenwich, in the county of Fairfield. The property attached consisted of a stock of goods, situate in the defendant’s store in Greenwich. The nominal plaintiff was a resident of the city of New Haven. The City Court of New Haven has no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thresher v. Stonington Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Beach v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. J. Mannos & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Eastern Oil Refining Co. v. Court of Burgesses of WallingfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Kelley v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Leventhal Furniture Co. v. Crescent Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Simmons v. SorrentinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964