Legal Opinion
In re S. P. Smith Lumber Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 22, 1904No. 318PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Bankruptcy. In re claim of R. H. McNatt On certificate from referee.
1Opinion of the Court
MEEK, District Judge.
The facts, so far as necessary to be stated, are given in the opinion. Claimant, R. H. McNatt, contends the bankrupt company became a joint contractor with one Brown for the construction and erection of claimant’s house. The eighteenth paragraph of the contract, which is the basis of the contention as well as for the claim presented against the estate of the bankrupt, provides in terms that the- S. P. Smith Dumber Company becomes a joint contractor with Brown for the construction and erection of the building. But the paragraph then provides and proceeds to define the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Davis v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- McCormick v. Market BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coleman v. TepelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Jenson v. Toltec Ranch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Stipp v. DoranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- W. C. Bowman Lumber Co. v. PiersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911