Allan v. Allan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The vital question is whether the trial court erred in concluding, upon the facts found, that the plaintiff had not “continuously resided” in this state for three years next before the date of her divorce complaint, as required by General Statutes, § 5181.
The parties were married in another state on November 10, 1938, and shortly thereafter removed to Guilford, Connecticut, established a home and resided there continuously for a period of nearly five years. During the latter period the defendant was guilty of intolerable cruelty, and on October 4, 1943, because of his cruel treatment, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bechtel v. BechtelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Morehouse v. MorehouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Duxstad v. DuxstadWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
- McLean v. RandellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Banfield v. BanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Davis v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Fuzessi v. FuzessiConnecticut Superior Court · 1946
- DiNicola v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.