Legal Opinion

Mannel v. Detroit, Mt. Clemens & Marine City Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1905No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from St.Clair; Law, J. Bill by William Mannel against the Detroit, Mt. Clemens & Marine City Railway to restrain the changing of a curve in defendant’s track. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Complainant in this case is the owner of certain lots at the intersection of Broadway and Water streets, in Marine City, St. Clair county, which he occupies for residence and business purposes. The corner building is, and has been for several years, used and occupied for a grocery store. Complainant’s son resides back *107of the store building. The complainant’s home is next south of the store. The defendant company operates an electric street railway along Broadway and Water streets, under and by virtue of an ordinance of the city of Marine City. Shortly before the filing of the bill of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People ex rel. Kunze v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co. v. Board of Public WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Falls v. Grand Rapids, Grand Haven & Muskegon Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Van Baalen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API