Legal Opinion

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Woldstad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1984No. 83-524PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell

This is an appeal from a summary judgment of the Gallatin County District Court. Truck Insurance Exchange, plaintiff in a declaratory judgment action below and appellant here, challenges the District Court’s interpretation of an insurance contract issued by appellant to Action Sales, Inc. The court found coverage effective for post-expiration injury where the defective product was sold while the policy was still in force. The court ordered payment of judgment *420and attorney fees. We affirm.

In June 1976 Richard Woldstad purchased a pickup-mounted camper from Action Sales, Inc. (Action). The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Company v. Pinski Brothers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. PhalenMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Atcheson v. Safeco Insurance CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Fassio v. Montana Physicians' ServiceMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Terry v. National Farmers Union Life Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PitroloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrewerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Newman v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Christensen v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Yovish v. United Services Automobile Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API