Legal Opinion

Cumberland Operating Co. v. Ogez

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1988No. 63015PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Chief Justice.

We address two questions today: first, whether salt water disposal is necessary for the production of oil and gas, thereby exempting a salt water disposal well from payment of ad valorem taxes upon payment of gross production taxes; second, if the answer to the first question is affirmative, whether the tax on the salt water disposal well should be apportioned on a pro rata basis so that the proportion of the well used for disposal of salt water from the lease on which the disposal well stands is relieved of ad valorem taxation but the proportion of the well used for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apache Gas Products Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Shaffer Oil & Refining Co. v. County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Home-Stake Production Co. v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. Oklahoma State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Briggs v. GaddisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carey Canada, Inc. v. California Union InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  2. Colburn v. Parker & Parsley Development Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  3. Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Ass'n v. YoungkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. BCE-MACH v. ROACHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. BCE-MACH v. ROACHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API