Legal Opinion
Connecticut Importing Co. v. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 10, 1940No. 104PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, District Judge.
This is a civil action for damages under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note. The case is now before the Court upon the motion of a defendant that the Court, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 53, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, appoint a Special Master to report to the court on several items relating to plaintiff’s claim of damages as stated in Paragraphs 24 and 25 of the substituted complaint and plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, appended thereto.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, by a conspiracy of the defendants, was wrongfully prevented after…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Veneri v. DraperCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Irving Trust Co. v. Trust Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.