Winn v. Sanborn
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Brule county, Hon. Franij B. Smith Judge. Action on contract. Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.
This was an action on contract. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.
On the trial an objection to a certain question propounded to defendant Sanborn, when- on the stand as a witness, was sustained. Appellant contends this w»s error. As substantially the same question was permitted to be answered without objection, the error, if any, was cured. State v. Smith, 8 S. D. 547, 67 N. W. 619.
The next error assigned is that the court erred in not instructing-the jury in reference to the provisions of Sec. 3564, Comp. Laws. This…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Uhe v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Frye v. FergusonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garrigan v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Belknap v. BelknapSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- De Noma v. Sioux Falls Traction SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. MillardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Lunschen v. UllomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.