Legal Opinion
Maichok v. Bertha-Consumers Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 3, 1928No. 4910, 4914PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
The corporation defendant in error is a citizen of West Virginia engaging in mining in that state, and also actively conducting its business at Cleveland in Ohio. Maiehok and Monanehik received personal injuries at the mine, and brought these tort actions against the corporation in the Ohio common pleas court at Cleveland. There was service of process, and the defendant removed the cases to the court below, and thereupon moved to set aside service and dismiss. These motions were granted.
Section 11276 of the Ohio General Code provides that any action, not local, may be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robert Mitchell Furniture Co. v. Selden Breck Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Clarendon Boat Oar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stern v. BeerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Bulin v. SteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rockwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Phillips v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.