FIRST NAT'L BK. OF RED BUD v. Chapman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones
Plaintiff bank appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant in a suit upon a written contract of guaranty signed by defendant. The judgment is properly silent as to the court’s reason for its decision but a letter from the court in the record indicates that reason to be that the evidence was insufficient to show or prove adequate consideration to support the contract of guaranty. We affirm.
Ray Chapman was a self-employed car dealer whose practice was to pledge automobile titles to the Bank of Red Bud to secure loans, the proceeds of which were to be used in running his business. On…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weger v. Robinson Nash Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Klein v. CurrierIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
- McMicken v. SaffordIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Zimmerman Ford, Inc. v. CheneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Blue Island Brewing Co. v. FraatzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCracken v. Olson Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Farmers Union Oil Co. of New England v. MaixnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- ITT Diversified Credit Corp. v. KimmelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- CONTINENTAL NAT'L BK. OF FORT WORTH v. SchillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. StanleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.