Legal Opinion

Board of Education v. Runnels

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The present controversy is upon an application for a mandamus to compel respondent, who is ex officio treasurer of relator, to deposit the school moneys in his hands in the First National Bank of Fort Huron, which made an accepted bid for the custody of such funds, and gave security to receive and hold them subject to the call of relator, as required by law, and to allow four per cent, interest. Respondent refused to transfer the moneys. An application by the bank for a mandamus was refused by us, as not being a proper remedy to enforce the contract. But now the board of education itself asks…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hogansville Banking Co. v. City of HogansvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. Public Schools of Benton HarborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API