Legal Opinion

Helen E. Gant, Appellant-Plaintiff v. Chicago and North Western Railway Company, Appellee-Defendant

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1970No. 20060_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff filed suit in the Polk County, Iowa District Court to recover for injuries suffered when a ear owned and driven by her husband, in which she was riding, collided with the caboose of defendant’s train at a country railroad crossing. Defendant removed the case to federal court on diversity grounds. 1

At the close of plaintiff’s ease, and again at the close of all of the evidence, defendant moved for a directed verdict. Each motion was denied. Only one specification of negligence was submitted to the jury. It pertained to the adequacy of the warning…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lindquist v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Schneider v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Plumb v. Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Strom v. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiedenfeld v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Kuper v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Paul Hazelo and Paul Hazelo, Administrator of the Estate of Edythe Hazelo, Deceased v. Bernhardt J. MesenbrinkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  4. Duncan v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Duncan v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API