Commonwealth v. One Hundred Twenty-five Thousand One Hundred Ninety-one Dollars
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.
Aftermath Cleaning Company, Inc. (Aftermath), contests the denial of its motion to intervene in a civil forfeiture case filed by the Commonwealth regarding assets seized from Michael Clancy. Aftermath argues that, as a judgment creditor, it should have been allowed to intervene as of right under Mass. R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2), 365 Mass. 769 (1974), or alternatively that the judge abused his discretion in denying permissive intervention pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 24(b)(2). Because we conclude that *280the Massachusetts forfeiture statute, G. L. c. 94C, § 47, as amended through St. 1998, c. 194, § 147,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. One-Sixth Share of Bulger in All Present & Future Proceeds of Mass Millions Lottery Ticket No. M246233Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Bolden v. O'Connor Café of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Massachusetts Federation of Teachers v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- United States v. $319,603.42 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beacon Residential Management, LP v. R.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Frostar Corp. v. MalloyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010