Singer v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.
Plaintiffs move for a temporary injunction. The defendant union makes a cross motion to dismiss the complaint as insufficient in law and upon the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action.
' The complaint alleges in substance that all of the plaintiffs are in the business of distributing seltzer and soda water as a one-man business, purchasing the soda from the' various defendant manufacturing companies in lots of ten, twenty or thirty boxes, and selling and delivering same to the homes of the consuming public; that each of the plaintiffs depends upon the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302 v. AngelosSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 v. WohlSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Thompson v. BoekhoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Baillis v. FuchsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Angelos v. MesevichNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Singer v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946