Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1927No. 16827PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.

The plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs below, and the defendants in error were the defendants below. The plaintiffs in error will be called plaintiffs, and the defendants in error will be referred to as defendants.

The defendants base their motion to dismiss this appeal on the following reason:

“The plaintiffs have abandoned this appeal by having instituted since this appeal was lodged in this court a suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, in which the parties and the matters involved are the same as the parties and the matters involved in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kerrison v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Beals v. Illinois, Missouri & Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mason v. Red River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. Cities Service Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Hopson v. Exterran Energy Solutions, LPSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. Chambers v. SavageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Dorchester Hugoton, Ltd. v. Dorchester Master Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API