Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Canton City School Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2000No. Nos. 98-2577 and 98-2667PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*15The opinion of the court of appeals is vacated for the reason that the court of appeals lacked subject-matter jurisdiction for lack of a final appealable order. See, e.g., Burger v. Cleveland Hts. (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 188, 718 N.E.2d 912; Estate of Weitzel v. Cuyahoga Falls (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 200, 718 N.E.2d 921; Braden v. Cleveland Bd. of Edn. (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 206, 718 N.E.2d 924.

Therefore, the cause is remanded to the trial court for determination of plaintiffs’ remaining claims.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burger v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Estate of Weitzel v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Braden v. Cleveland Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Stevens v. AckmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hubbard v. Canton City School Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Stevens v. AckmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Klein v. Portage CountyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API