Legal Opinion

McKissick v. Three Deer Ass'n

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 17, 2010No. Civil No. 3:09-CV-780 (CFD)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.

The plaintiff, Toye McKissick (“McKis-sick”), has filed a motion to compel the defendants, Three Deer Association Limited Partnership and MCR Property Management, Inc. (“the defendants”), to produce full and complete responses to McKissick’s first sets of production requests and interrogatories. (Dkt.# 21.) Subsequent to the date on which McKissick filed the instant motion, the parties “met and conferred and culled the matters at issue.” (Def.’s Opp’n 1.) Although these efforts enabled the parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Horace Mann Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Cargill, Inc. v. Ron Burge Trucking, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  3. (PC) Godoy v. FavelaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. Adam Bradstreet v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2026
  5. Darryl Bradshaw v. James Caldwell, et al.District Court, W.D. New York · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API