Legal Opinion

Machin v. Carus Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 26, 2017No. Appellate Case No. 2015-000901; Opinion No. 27714PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE KITTREDGE:

This Court accepted the following certified questions from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:

1. Under South Carolina law, when a Plaintiff seeks recovery from a person, other than his employer, for an injury sustained on the job, may the jury hear an explanation of why the employer is not part of the instant action?

2. Under South Carolina law, when a Plaintiff seeks recovery from a person, other than his employer, for an injury sustained on the job, may a defendant argue the *531empty chair defense and suggest that Plaintiffs employer is the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Snyder v. LTG Lufttechnische GmbHTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Carroll v. WhitneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Troup v. Fischer Steel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. TiffanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Frampton v. SCDNRCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  3. Frampton v. SCDNRCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  4. Hencely v. Fluor CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  5. Stephen R. Edwards v. Scapa Waycross Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API