Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 26, 2005No. 23111-9-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

116 P.3d 450 (2005)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Lawrence Richard HUNT, Appellant.

No. 23111-9-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Ten.

July 26, 2005.

Carol A. Elewski, Attorney at Law, East Olympia, WA, for Appellant.

Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, Attorneys at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

BROWN, J.

¶ 1 Lawrence R. Hunt was found guilty of taking a motor vehicle without permission. On appeal, Mr. Hunt contends: (1) the court erred in giving WPIC 4.01A to the jury, because the instruction's definition of reasonable doubt violates due process; and (2) his sentence…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API