Legal Opinion

Trammell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1942No. 22150Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

GRAVES, Judge.

The State’s Attorney has filed a motion for a rehearing herein, alleging that we were in error in our holding that the provisions of Art. 728, C. C. P. were violated when the trial court failed to allow Dr. Koepsel to detail the latter portion of a conversation with appellant wherein he said: “I don’t know why he did" that to me; I don’t know why he would do that to me; I had to shoot him” or “I had to shoot.”

It is said of Art. 728, C. C. P. that: “This article expands the common law rule. At common law, when a confession or admission is introduced in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Autry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API