Legal Opinion
Peloke v. Scheid
New York County Courts
Decided May 26, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*607OPINION OF THE COURT
Dan Lamont, J.
Plaintiffs move for summary judgment in this action brought pursuant to RPAPL articles 5 and 15 claiming adverse possession of and seeking a determination of claims to real property. Defendants cross-move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
For the reasons which follow, this court holds and determines that plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment adjudging them lawful owners vested with absolute title in fee simple of the 10-foot by 127.42-foot strip , of land described in paragraph 9 of the amended complaint herein.
To obtain summary judgment, it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Ehrlich v. American Moninger Greenhouse Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodrow v. SissonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- United Matura Realty, Inc. v. Reade Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- United States v. McCombs-EllisonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993