Legal Opinion

Wasmuth-Endicott Co. v. Washington Towers, Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 18, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Berry, V. C.

The exceptions, four in number, are by five general creditors and are all to the same effect.

The first challenges the allowance of complainant’s claim of $3,464.16 as a preferred claim.

The second, third and fourth so-called exceptions are not exceptions at all, but aré objections to allowances asked for by the receiver and his counsel as compensation for their services.

They will be considered in their order.

All exceptants rely upon the brief of counsel for the ex-ceptant Eastern Sash and Door Company, who also argued the matter orally.

I

The unfamiliarity of exceptants’ counsel with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Girard Trust Co. v. CheesemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re RothenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. NEWARK STEEL, ETC. v. Pearl Metal Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Mayo v. City National Bank & Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API