Legal Opinion

Seisser v. Oregon Short Line Railroad

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, for Bingham County. Hon. F. J. Cowen, Judge. Suit to quiet title. Judgment for defendant. The appeal is from an order for a judgment, which has not been entered, and this court is without jurisdiction to consider the same. (Oliver v. Kootenai County, 13 Ida. 281, 90 Pac. 107; Santti v. Hartman, 29 Ida. 490, 161 Pae. 249.)

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

This case was submitted to the district court on an agreed statement of facts, in lieu of evidence, and the following decision was rendered:

“JUDGMENT.
“The above-entitled matter having heretofore been taken under advisement for consideration and decision by the court; comes now the court and renders his decision, ánd orders judgment entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs, thereby dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.
“Judgment rendered December 31, 1917.
“F. J. COWEN, 'Judge.
“Filed December 31, 1917.”

*292This is not a judgment, but an order for one, and is not appealable. (Santti…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Santti v. HartmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Gooding Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. First Trust & Savings Bank v. RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Heidemann v. KruegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API