Legal Opinion

Dyer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1953No. 34389PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In his charge to the jury the court, after defining the offense, charged as follows: “Now, with reference to the decree of alimony that has been introdxiced in evidence here, I charge you that if there, has been full compliance of the order of alimony so far as the minor children are concerned, there could be no violation of the law and yoxi should return a verdict of not guilty. However, if you find there has not been a full compliance with the alimony—that is, if it has not been paid in full, then you woxild be authorized to find the defendant guilty,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Blackwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Ozburn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Pasley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Barrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Weltzbarker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API