Legal Opinion

Harcrest International, Ltd. v. M/V Zim Keelung

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided January 28, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-2195Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEEBE, Chief Judge.

This cause came on for hearing January 13, 1988 on the motion of third-party defendant, Intermodal Transportation, Inc., to dismiss the complaint as it pertains against itself.

The Court, having considered the record, the arguments of counsel, and the memo-randa submitted by the parties, is now fully advised in the premises and ready to rule. Accordingly,

IT IS THE ORDER OF THE COURT that the motion to dismiss of third-party defendant, Intermodal Transportation Services, Inc., be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.

REASONS

This action involves cargo (shirts), belonging to Harcrest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kathy L. Joiner, Etc. v. Diamond M Drilling Co. And Halliburton Company, and Third-Party v. Dr. C. Babson Fresh, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. McCann v. Falgout Boat Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  3. Stinson v. S. S. Kenneth McKayDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1973
  4. Gauthier v. Crosby Marine Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API