Legal Opinion
United States v. Martinez-Gonzalez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 2003No. Nos. 01-30459, 01-30460, 02-30178; D.C. Nos. CR-00-00330-21-TSZ, CR-00-00330-TSZ, CR-00-00330-Z-27PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Jesse Martinez-Gonzalez (“Martinez-Gonzalez”), Miguel Benitez-Ruiz (“Ruiz”), and Osman Alejandro Mencia-Morales (“Mencia-Morales”) were charged with various crimes related to a heroin and methamphetamine distribution operation. Martinez-Gonzalez and Ruiz were convicted by juries on all charges; each appeals his convictions. Mencia-Morales appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
DISCUSSION
I Martinez-Gonzalez
Martinez-Gonzalez argues that the Government presented insufficient evidence to support his convictions for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Hector Francisco MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Willard Cortez RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Deborah Jean RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benitez-Ruiz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003