Legal Opinion

Muggridge v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1972No. 27379PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

In view of the stipulated facts and undisputed evidence, in order for the claimants to recover, a finding must have been authorized that the State Highway Department had abandoned the area covered by the encroachment.

Whether the conveyance from Stevens to the State Highway Board was a deed granting fee simple title or was merely the grant of an easement is immaterial to a decision of the case sub judice. In either event the construction and maintenance of a roadway running the distance of the strip of land, but not extending the full width of the conveyed strip of land would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. R. G. Foster & Co. v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Cason v. Upson County Board of HealthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. Davidson v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. State Highway Department v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. Waller v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. MilfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Sutton v. City of CordeleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Martin v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Department of Transportation v. McCollumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API