Muggridge v. State Highway Department
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Justice.
In view of the stipulated facts and undisputed evidence, in order for the claimants to recover, a finding must have been authorized that the State Highway Department had abandoned the area covered by the encroachment.
Whether the conveyance from Stevens to the State Highway Board was a deed granting fee simple title or was merely the grant of an easement is immaterial to a decision of the case sub judice. In either event the construction and maintenance of a roadway running the distance of the strip of land, but not extending the full width of the conveyed strip of land would…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- R. G. Foster & Co. v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Cason v. Upson County Board of HealthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Davidson v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- State Highway Department v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Waller v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. MilfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Sutton v. City of CordeleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Martin v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Department of Transportation v. McCollumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973