De Weese v. JC PENNY COMPANY
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentWorthen, Justice
I am unable to agree with the conclusion of the majority opinion, I believe that the case should be reversed and the trial court should be directed to either dismiss the action or grant a new trial.
The witness Caffall, a tile contractor, was properly permitted to testify as to the nature of terrazzo; that it is made of cement, marble chips and a suitable color; that it is laid in a plastic form; after it is set, it is ground smooth and polished; that to obviate the slickness, nonslip materials such as carborundum and London grits are added. But the witness was improperly permitted to testify…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- J.C. Penny Co. v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Brody v. Albert Lifson & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Erickson v. Walgreen Drug Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- Kipp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.