Legal Opinion · Dissent

De Weese v. JC PENNY COMPANY

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1956No. 8347Published

1DissentWorthen, Justice

I am unable to agree with the conclusion of the majority opinion, I believe that the case should be reversed and the trial court should be directed to either dismiss the action or grant a new trial.

The witness Caffall, a tile contractor, was properly permitted to testify as to the nature of terrazzo; that it is made of cement, marble chips and a suitable color; that it is laid in a plastic form; after it is set, it is ground smooth and polished; that to obviate the slickness, nonslip materials such as carborundum and London grits are added. But the witness was improperly permitted to testify…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. J.C. Penny Co. v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Brody v. Albert Lifson & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Erickson v. Walgreen Drug Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Kipp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API