Tucker v. Kirkpatrick
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original proceeding in mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action is one of mandamus, to compel the national officers and national executive committee of the Security Benefit Association to restore the charter of Capital Council No. 1, a subordinate body of the association.
The plaintiffs are members of Capital Council No. 1, and are-holders of beneficiary certificates issued by the association. They claim their insurance is jeopardized by dissolution of the-subordinate council, which was effected by a decision of the-national executive committee, a tribunal having jurisdiction-. *882over the subject.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burton v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wichita Council No. 120 v. Security Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Flynn v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Johnson v. Prince Hall Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Lawson v. Brotherhood of American YeomenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Tucker v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.