Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Kirkpatrick

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 20, 1920No. 22,867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action is one of mandamus, to compel the national officers and national executive committee of the Security Benefit Association to restore the charter of Capital Council No. 1, a subordinate body of the association.

The plaintiffs are members of Capital Council No. 1, and are-holders of beneficiary certificates issued by the association. They claim their insurance is jeopardized by dissolution of the-subordinate council, which was effected by a decision of the-national executive committee, a tribunal having jurisdiction-. *882over the subject.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burton v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wichita Council No. 120 v. Security Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Flynn v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Johnson v. Prince Hall Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Lawson v. Brotherhood of American YeomenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Tucker v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API