Deane v. Deane

Defendant moves to vacate plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars concerning defendant’s counterclaim for a divorce. The motion is disposed of as hereinafter set forth.

Complexity and prolixity beget complexity and prolixity. If plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars is lengthy, it is necessarily so because of the length and prolixity of defendant’s counterclaim. Under these circumstances, the court does not regard defendant’s demand as being so unreasonable and burdensome as to constitute an abuse of the right to a bill of particulars. (See Golden v. Eastern Life Ins. Co., 281 App.…