Land v. Berzin
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By TERRELL, J.
Plaintiff brought an action a,gainst defendant in the municipal court of Cleveland for injuries sustained in an automo*704bile collision, on the theory that the driver ol the automobile causing the collision and consequent injuries to the plaintiff, was the servant oí the defendant engaged at the time in the course of his employment, so that as against the defendant in this case he attempted to apply the doctrine of respondeat superior.
Defendant filed an answer in which he denied that the driver of said automobile was his servant or was acting within the scope of his…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Taylor, Admr. v. QuinnOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
- Hanes v. TicatchOhio Court of Appeals · 1957