Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Schmidt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1925No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

There are a large number of defendants in this case, but most of them are nominal and the real controversy is between plaintiff and Dorothy Waters Fitzgerald, Charles L. Bertch and Cora M. Bertch, who will be hereafter referred to as defendants. These parties together with Hazel McGregor, plaintiff’s secretary, own all the stock of Associated Merchants Company, defendants owning 1,500 shares, plaintiff 950 shares and Hazel McGregor 50 shares. The company has a lease for a period of years of an apartment house owned by plaintiff and for some time has so successfully conducted it under the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noble v. GrandinMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Bernalillo County Valuation Protest BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Acorn Investment Co v. Michigan Basic Property Insurance AssnMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Orloff v. StottMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Frans v. Harleysville Lake States InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Ripley v. LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API