Legal Opinion

ItalCable SpA v. Envoy Global, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2001No. 00-15560; BAP No. NC-99-01110-RyMerPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

ItalCable SpA (“ItalCable”) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) reversal of the judgment of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties; they are not recited herein, except as necessary.

I

ItalCable asserts that a contingent payment clause in its contract with Envoy Global, Inc., constitutes an illegal forfeiture. Under Oregon law, forfeiture clauses are treated as liquidated damages clauses. See Bennett v. Les Schwab Tire Ctrs. of Or., 48 Or.App. 909, 618 P.2d 455 (Or.Ct.App.1980)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bennett v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Halen v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API