Legal Opinion

Ludlam v. Ludlam

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL by the defendant Maximo M. Ludlam, from a judgment entered at a special term, after a trial at the circuit, before Justice Lott, without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtEmott, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against Silas and Edward Ludlam and William H. Hewitt, who are the executors of her father, Richard L. Ludían^ and against Maximo Ludlam, who is her only surviving brother, to compel the former to account for and pay over to her, to the exclusion of the latter, all the proceeds of the sale of certain lands in the county of Queens and the city of Hew York. These lands were owned by Thomas R. Ludlam, a brother of Richard R. Ludlam, the plaintiff’s father. Richard R. Ludlam died in 1838, and Thomas R. Ludlam died in 1847, intestate, and thus the children of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  2. Young v. PeckNew York Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary Evans JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Farrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. United States v. WardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1890
  4. Ex parte ReynoldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1879
  5. Trump v. BarbaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API