Legal Opinion
Alexander H. Kerr & Co. v. Fooks
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided October 30, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 716PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
Statement
This case was tried to the Court, without a jury, on October 2, 1956, and at the conclusion of the trial the Court took the case under advisement in order to study the exhibits introduced by the parties. And ' now the Court, having considered the pleadings, ore tenus testimony of the witnesses, exhibits, and briefs of the parties, makes and files herein its findings of fact and conclusions of law, separately stated.
Findings of Fact
1
The plaintiff is a Nevada corporation. The defendants, B. T. Fooks, Guiñare Fooks, and Frances Sue Fooks are citizens of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lieberman v. . Templar Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Desoto Life Insurance Co. v. JeffettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- McMillan, Administrator v. PalmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Cockrill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Famous Music Corporation v. Seeco Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Autrey v. Williams & DunlapDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1962
- Alexander H. Kerr and Company, Inc. v. B. T. FooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- B. T. Fooks v. Alexander H. Kerr and Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- United States Rubber Co. v. PulliamDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957