Brian Hoxie's Painting Co. v. Cato-Meridian Central School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Green and Pine, JJ.
(dissenting). The majority, while recognizing that section 200-d of the Labor Law applies to a school district, nevertheless affirms the grant of summary judgment to defendant school district on the ground that plaintiff has failed to state a valid cause of action. We disagree. Defendant violated section 220-d of the Labor Law by failing to include in the advertised specifications for the contract a provision stating the minimum hourly rate of wage which can be paid and the minimum supplement that can be provided. It is well established that violation of a statute may…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. GoldinNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Golden v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- E. Williamson Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Town of ParishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Varsity Transit Inc. v. SaporitaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.