Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1990No. 851323; CA A50810PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Wife appeals an order denying her motion to modify a judgment of dissolution to increase her spousal support and to make it permanent. On de novo review, we reverse.

The parties were married in 1969. A judgment of dissolution was entered in November, 1986. The dissolution court found:

“Wife has idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). She tests positive for inflammatory tenosynovitis, but may not have it. Her rheumatoid factor is positive, but she does not necessarily have it. She tests negative for systemic lupus erythematosus [lupus]. She has better than [a] 50-50 chance of developing one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of WolfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of TomosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. In re the Marriage of MaierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. In re the Marriage of ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. In re the Marriage of GradyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. In re the Marriage of RaeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API