Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Autry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1956No. 36276PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. The great-grandsons of a common ancestor are, under the civil law, related within the sixth degree. Smith v. State, 62 Ga. App. 494 (8 S. E. 2d 663), and cit.

2. As provided by Code § 59-716, a juror, related by consanguinity or affinity to any party interested in the result of the case, within the sixth degree, as computed by the civil law, is disqualified to serve in the trial of the case.

3. Such disqualification of such a juror, however, will not result in the grant of a new trial unless it is shown that the movant was injured by such a disqualified juror’s serving upon the jury or that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lampkin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Moore v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Asso.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Ethridge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Felker v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Geiger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Glover v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Norman v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Georgia Power Co. v. MozingoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Brindle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API