Legal Opinion
In re Muraskin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 10, 2002PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent David V. Muraskin was admitted to the practice *34of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on February 25, 1974 as David Van Muraskin. At all times relevant to these proceedings, he maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys on the ground that he has been disbarred upon his conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e).
By an information filed on…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re MargiottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re AshleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re PeifferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re JacobiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4Cited by10 opinions
- In re SorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re MercadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re CollazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re StarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of GoldfarbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.