Legal Opinion
Houck v. Cape Girardeau Waterworks & Electric Light Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 23, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Transferred from St. Louis Court of Appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
We stall not go into the merits of this case. The case reaches us from the St. Louii. Court of Appeals. The per curiam opinion hy which it reaches us reads:
“Appellant insists that this case ought to he certified to the Supreme Court because our decision is in conflict with the decision of that tribunal in Crone v. Stinde, 156 Mo. 262. The facts of this case, as stated *476in the petition, so greatly resemble those in Howsmon v. Water Co., 119 Mo. 304, that we felt controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in the latter case; but it looks like the principle on which the Howsmon case was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howsmon v. Trenton Water Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Crone v. StindeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. LowderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Seaboard National Bank v. WoestenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. LowderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Epstein v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- State ex rel. Gilman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- State ex rel. Swarthout v. County CourtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912