Legal Opinion

Arrow Communication Laboratories, Inc. v. Pico Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In 1984 defendant Pico Products, Inc. (defendant), holder of a United States patent for "encoder” and "decoder” devices for a television security system, granted plaintiff a license to manufacture and sell the devices. In 1988 the parties entered into a revised license agreement (the license agreement). Paragraph 4 (d) of the license agreement provides the method for calculating the royalties to be paid to defendant. Construing paragraph 4 (d) as establishing a time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Mitchell v. New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Telaro v. TelaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Leon v. LukashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Maniolos v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Kibler v. Gillard Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. MAVEN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. VASILE, GAYLE A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Jellinick v. Joseph J. Naples & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API