Legal Opinion

Piotrowski v. T. O. Dey Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1936No. Appeal, 103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This appeal is from the judgment entered in a workmen’s compensation case in favor of claimant.

The decedent, a girl 19 years of age, was employed in a shoe repair shop owned hy the defendant and occupying a space in the Joseph Horne store, Pittsburgh. On February 24,1933, about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, she was engaged in cutting tickets off shoes with a small knife. While.no one actually saw her cut her finger, which was the accident alleged, Samuel Blatt, defendant’s manager, testified: “I didn’t see the way she was cutting herself, but from the second her finger…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denne v. Plymouth Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Felker v. American Chain Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lambing v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Toland v. Murphy Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Easton v. Elk Tanning Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Troxell v. ShirkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Roebuck v. Swift & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API