United States v. Powers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Jethro Rene Powers appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), requires that a defendant be able to confront his accuser if the accuser’s “testimonial” statements are introduced at trial. Powers contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by allowing police officers to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Langham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- United States v. DeitzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WarmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Robert BurstonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. PenalozaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.